Judicial Emp. HBCS: WP. WA, O.S Etc., : To collect “certified Copies of ‘Court Order Sheets”, Interim Orders, Final Judgments
 Judges enrolling as Members of Employee Society:-
[01.01]Origin of ” Judges enrolling as Members of Employee KSJD Emp HBCS is reflected in investigations carried-out by Karnataka State Vigilance Commission in Compt/Uplok/BCD-64/1999-2000″ in Society’s Annual Audit Reports for years 1982-83, 1983-84, & 1984-85 , 1985-86 presumably by D.B. Deogirikar.
Reports say: “Byelaw No. 7 includes Judges of High court”. Society’s limits / Area of operation is “Bangalore Development Authority”. Society was registered No. J.R.B/R.G.S 39/4916/83-84 dated 11th August, 1983.
Contrarily Supreme Court in S.P. Gupta vs President Of India And Ors. on 30 December, 1981 held Judges Transfer, appointment transfer, promotion etc., shall not in the hands-of Government; but at Chief Justice
To continue .
List out “How many Judges appointed by Karnataka Chief Justice till date have become Members of this HBCS”
[01… ] As per Applicant’s Investigations about 4,800 plus Persons have enrolled in Karnataka Judicial Department Employees House Building Co-operative Society. Such mambers claim to be “Employees of Karnataka Judicial Department”. All Members have declared that they are Employees of High Court or Lower Courts or working in Karnataka Judicial Department. Hence hereafter Court Officer, Registrars, Magistrates, District Judges, Registrars, Registrar Generals of High Court, two sitting and seven retired Judges of Supreme court, about two Dozen of Judges who have served in various High Courts of India as Chief Justices, three retired Chief Justices of India, two Serving Chief Justices of Orissa and Kerala High Courts, Judges, CJs of HCs, CJIs are all Employees. Such members do not enjoy any Privilege that is available to “Judges who are not Members of this or such Employees Housing Society”. All such members are equally responsible for Good or Bad done by Management of Society, which is elected by all members, voted or not. Whether Members are allotted with Site or not, in any Crimes committed by Society, it is u/s 34 of I.P.C. If any member is deceased his or her legal representatives are responsible for fruits and crimes as is done with common intention.
01.02] Karnataka Employees HBCS has developed Two Layouts viz., JUDICIAL Layout at Yelahanka in 193 Acres and another at Talaghattapura Village on Kanakapura Road. Third one near Bidadi or Ramnagar is consideration by BMRDA, as per Society submission to Kar high court. Sufficient to say that the Karnataka Employees HBCS has committed similar, less or more crimes in other two layouts, which independent Government Investigating agency such as C.B.I , which three SC & HC judges pray in WP.PIL 7105/2007, shall reveal. Hence JUDICIAL Layout Vs. Karnataka Employees HBCS gist given below.
01.03] Brief of frauds committed by Karnataka Employees HBCS in JUDICIAL Layout at Yelahanka in 193 Acres:
a] Government had notified 170 Acres of “Futher Extension of Karnataka Housing Board layout, at Yelhanka by 4 Notification. This land got Denotified by Karnataka Employees HBCS to get it notified to form JUDICIAL Layout
b] In 1988 Karnataka Employees HBCS signed Agreement with Karnataka Government in accordance with Part-VII of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as amended in 1984, treating the Karnataka Employees HBCS, as Private Company. This Agreement was allowed to be used by Employee-Judges ‘at times to the advantage’ and ‘at times to suppress the same; to consider acuisition is for Public Purpose under Chapter-II of L.A. Act,1894’ by collusion of Government, High Court and Lower Courts to the detriment of Rule of Law and JUSTICE. Contrary to any respect for Rule of Law, Judgments, honesty, Morality, Integrity worth the Lordship or Judges, poor uneducated farmers’ lands were illegally got acquired.
c] Karnataka Employees HBCS failed to deposit with SLAO Rs. Rs.2,02,55,734-50 [Ann-… ] in ninety days from the date of signing Agreement.
c] But the similar Agreements signed by Sreenivasa Housing society of Advocates and Charted Accuontants of Andhra Pradesh was struck down & declared by N. Venkatachala through Supreme Court Order in SRINIVASA CO-OP. HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. v. MADAM G. SASTRY, (1994) 4 Supreme Court Cases 675.
c] Karnataka Employees HBCS failed to pay cost of News Paper publication of 4, 6 etc., did not pay any Compensation . Society represented by its Director N. Shivanna appeared as Owners before S.L.A.O and consented to pass Awards and acknowledged for having received Compensation. Hence SLAO passed similar consent Awards for 87 Acres based on Society Directors consenting to Awards, not Land Owners. Seems SLAO paid few lakhs to five land owners after 18-05-93 per Annexure No. ….. Scanned copy pages from register of S.L.A.O is enclosed, so as to identify the persons behind various crimes committed & prosecute them in land aqcuistition, Stage-Managed-Land-Acquisition by Karnataka Employees HBCS with express Blessing of Court Orders. No compensation paid to land owners, no PENNY paid to Government towards land Conversion, Government’s expenditure over land aqcuisition and attending litigations.
XX] However SLAO; except High Court Order in 1994 to hand-over 17 Acres 18 Guntas; did not handed-over the balance139 Acres of lands to Lands to Karnataka Employees HBCS, though 156 Acres is taken posession, for Society failed to pay Rs. 2.02 Crores. Hence legally Judicial Layout is formed sites, though revenue sites, in only 17 Acres 18 guntas. But Karnataka Employees HBCS, Government have misguided and continue to High Court, its beneficiaries, Members, General Public including Lokayukta that “Society has formed Sites in 156 Acres and in 37 Acres accrued by private Compromise with Land Lords; and having executed Sale Deeds stating layout is approved B.D.A in 1992 for 156 Acres of Land is Fraud on Constitution of India” and the “Karnataka High Court; its Member-Judges, Judicial Officers .
.XX.] Government, both Political and Executive colluded with Anti-Social activities of Karnataka Employees HBCS. They failed to take-over the lands along with buildings; as Karnataka Employees HBCS violated all terms of Agreement, with Blessings of High Court and Lower Court orders. Possibly it is done on Quid-pro-quo basis, to have Illegal, unethical, un-holy constitutional relation with Judiciary, Judicial Bodies and Lokayukta, legal officers, Law Secretaries.
.XX] The Directors have Karnataka Employees HBCS have filed Affidavit dated 21 September 2004 in Karnataka High Court in W.P.[PIL] 40994/2002 stating that every law is violated by Grace of Lordships and Judgments. Annexure…. .
c] Karnataka Employees HBCS violated each and every Government, B.D.A, etc., with the help of Judgments of Karnataka High Court. Most Judges who gave Judgments are Members of Karnataka Employees HBCS. Judges Names and case numbers:
.XX] 156 Acres’ Land Conversion Fees: WP. No. 2382 of 1990.[Link in website 026.06 ] Justice S. Rajendra Babu;Interim Order [026.08 ] staying Convrsion fees. Justice Chandrashekariah. Judgement 11th NOV 1996 [026.09]. In W. A. 138 of 1997; R. P. SETHI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. R. BANNURMATH Judgment dated 25th June, 1997.[ 026.04 Jmnt in WA]. 2007 …..Find-out…..Judgment Karnataka High DB set aside Land conrsion fee need not be paid by Society, but by Site Owners who are Occupiers of land.
b] Karnataka Cabinet Decision not to hand-over lands to Housing Society had directed on 17 January, 1990 to stay L.A. proceedings with immediate effect. Again the Cabinet on 6th August,1993 by Ho’ble Chief Minister Veerappa Moily reads thus: Subject : No. C. 18 – 1993. Role of House Building Co-operative Societies in tackling housing shortage in Bangalore City and other major cities in the State. CABINET DECISION : Cabinet considered the subject at a great length. Since many of the non-genuine housing societies had been given land, it was decided to take the following steps:- (a) Wherever lands have not yet been handed over to the Housing Societies, they should not be handed over, but should be handed over to BDA; for being given to the genuine members of the societies: (b) Wherever lands have already been handed over to the Housing Societies, they should be taken back to Government to be handed over to the Bangalore Development Authority for being given to the genuine members of the Societies: (c) An enquiry should be held as to how orders were issued and lands handed over to societies in contravention of the Cabinet decision. Sd/-.(M. VEERAPPA MOILY). Chief Minister 6-1-1993.
XX] Government / SLAO notified in Gazette u/s 16 of ‘Taking Possession of lands’ for JUDICIAL layout on following dates:
i] Gazette dated 25th June, 1992 …. …. ..91 Acres 13.25 Guntas [ Evidence: Read More ]
ii] Gazette dated 17th December, 1992 …….. 47 Acres 35.50 Guntas [ Evidence: Read More ]
iii] Gazette dated 13th May, 1993 …….. ………17 Acres 18.00 Guntas [ Evidence: Read More ]
……Total Extent of Lands.. 156 Acres 26.75 Guntas .
De-notificationof 169 Acres of Lands for Public Purpose to this Employees Society in1985 by the then Government.Two 16 Notifications in 1992 & one 16 Notification in 1993 in this Scanned Document of 13 Pages. [ Read More ]
b]B.D.A Plan Approval: Karnataka Employees HBCS on 6th November,1992 approached B.D.A to approve layout plan in 156 Acres 26 Guntas. B.D.A approves in principle, subject to various conditions including to produce ownership of lands, on 16th November, 1992 and B.D.A intimates the same by its letter of 28th November,1992 to Karnataka Employees HBCS.
XXX] Karnataka Employees HBCS files WP No. W.P. Nos. 39338 – 41 / 1992
questioning the B.D.A Conditions. Justice stays the B.D.A demands …….. .
XXX] Karnataka Employees HBCS filed petition WP 1600/1994 in High Court praying to direct SLAO to hand-over 17 Acres 18 Guntas to Society. Petition was listed before Justice G.P. Shivaprakash. On 3rd July 1989 SLAO had directed the Karnataka Employees HBCS to deposit Balance amount of Rs. 65 Lakhs, towards cost of acquisition. On 10th February,1994 Justice G.P. Shivaprakash directed the SLAO to hand-over 17 acres 18 guntas to Karnataka Employees HBCS.
Government directed to SLAO on 28 August,1994 to handover 17 acres 18 guntas to Karnataka Employees HBCS. Hence SLAO handed-over 17 acres 18 guntas to Karnataka Employees HBCS on 2nd September,1994.
Karnataka Employees HBCS files petition in 1994 vide WP No.
XXX] Karnataka Government directs on 11-05-1994 to Inspector General of Registrar, Bangalore’s all sub-registrars not to Register any sale deeds presented by 32 Housing Socities of Bangalore, until and unless Societies get ‘No Objection Certificates from both Deaprtments of Co-operation and B.D.A’ to register site.
xxx] On request of Karnataka Employees HBCS, Justice R.V. Raveendran on 13th November 1996 allows the Societies to withdraw the petitions W.P. Nos. 39338 – 41 / 1992 by High Court Order. Means that Societies agreed to fulfill all conditions put forth by B.D.A. but till date Karnataka Employees HBCS failed to ulfill all conditions put forth by B.D.A; muchless the Ownership of Lands handed-over to Society by Government.
01.03] JUDICIAL Layout at Yelahanka in 193 Acres: Beneficiaries & Conspirators of the Scam: Supreme Court of India : 4 Sitting Judges, 4 CJIs [Retd], 8 Judges [Retd], Karnataka High Court: 21 Sitting Judges, 47 Chief Justices & Judges [Across India] [Retd] Total: 120 SC & HC Judges. And 747 Judges of Karnataka Subordinate Judiciary . About 1,000 Plus law Graduates because of which they are appointed as Court Officers, Asst & Deputy Registrars from across Karnataka.
Members. The other Members who might not have been allotted sites here are also equally Responsible for the Crimes committed in and every step of Karnataka Employees HBCS securing Dozens of judgments from Karnataka Lower Court, High Court and Supreme Court in developing JUDICIAL Layout at Yelahanka in 193 Acres have committed Crimes punishable under:
[A] I.P.C. Sec. 34 r/w 120-A & B [Criminal Conspiracy] r/w Chapters IX [ OF OFFENCES BY OR RELATING TO PUBLIC SERVANTS ], X [ OF CONTEMPTS OF THE LAWFUL AUTHORITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS ], XI [ OF FALSE EVIDENCE AND OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC JUSTICE ],
XIV [ OF OFFENCES AFFECTING THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, CONVENIENCE, DECENCY AND MORALS ], XVI [ OF OFFENCES AFFECTING THE HUMAN BODY ], XVII [ OF OFFENCES AGAINST PROPERTY ], XVIII [ OF OFFENCES RELATING TO DOCUMENTS AND TO PROPERTY MARKS ] ,
XIX [ OF THE CRIMINAL BREACH OF CONTRACTS OF SERVICE ] .
[B] Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggrs, Goondas, Immoral, Slum Grabbers, Act, 1985 .
[C] Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
[D] The Contempt of Court Act, 1971 .
01.04] Applicant Accused, owner of said websites, is working in close Co-operation in Government and Private Sector with nationalistic organizations like www.judicialreforms.org , http://pucl.org/ , http://lokpal-hindi.blogspot.in/ , Samaj Parivartana Samudaya , http://www.indiaagainstcorruption.org/index1.html , http://www.aidprojects.org , http://www.transparency.org/ and such other agencies like N.G.O.s, Media, Advocates and public spirited men with patriotism. Applicant addressing the burning issues ofc in India in high Places of Governance so as to reduce, if not to eliminate CORRUPTION and see that India stands with her head held high . We also keep informing the latest information to Governmental Law Enforcing Agencies since 2003 like cbi.nic.in , cvc.nic.in ,, of late with ksp.gov.nic.in , other State & Central Law Enforcing Authorities Enforcement Directorate etc.,
01.04] Applicants’ websites deal with Rampant Corruption in Judiciary, with Facts and Figures. It is to see that Corruption is reduced in Indian Judiciary. And the Transparency, Impartiality, Judicial Integrity, Judicial Accountability, Impartial Trial of Cases etc., is enforced; which is Cry of United Nations Convention Against Corruption, signed by India in 2005 and Ratified in 2010, news paper Report. Ann-3.
01.04] 2,400 Sites & Castles Built-In-Air; without having Titles to Lands!
“Karnataka Employees HBCS” Versus Judges in the Garb of Upa-Lokayukta & Lokayukta; abused their Offices with Corrupt Motives . Since Twenty years “searching Layout Plan & Lands; by My Lords”
[a] Upa Lokayukta G.P. Shivaprakash suo moto commenced investigations vide Complaint No. Compt//UpLok/BCD/64/1999 on 4/12/1999 against “SHIVALINGAIAH, PRESIDENT, KAR.STATE JUDL. DEPT.EMP.HOUSE BLGD.CO-OP.SOCIETY, BANGALORE” under heading “IRREGULARITIES, NEPOTISM AND CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN ALLOT- MENT OF SITES”.
[b] Up-Lokayukta wrote letter on 6th September, 1999 to B.D.A asking “whether JUDICIAL Layout is Approved by B.D.A and whether B.D.A has handed over Layout to C.M.C, Yelahanka”. As per our Investigations B.D.A replied to Up Lokayukta’s letter on 8th October, 1999 stating “ Neither B.D.A has approved JUDICIAL Layout Plan nor B.D.A has passed any Order to Hand-over JUDICIAL Layout to C.M.C, Yelahanka”.
[c] After retirement of G.P. Shivaprakash, Justice N. Venkatachala was appointed as Karnataka Lokayukta. He instead of passing Orders as per Lokayukta Act or Handing over Investigations to C.B.I chose to close the case on 13th March, 2002 . It may kindly be noted that both G.P. Shivaprakash and Justice N. Venkatachala Karnataka Lokayukta were and are Allottees of sites in JUDICIAL Layout .
[d] Websites Investigation are trying to bring to the kind perusal the True Facts to the attention of Supreme Court of India, Union Home Ministry, Karnataka Governement, Legislature, B.D.A, Karnataka High Court, Media, Trasparency International, C.B.I, Karnataka Police, Advocates, whole world. To see that respect of Public to the Hon’ble Judges who are not party, Members to the ‘Cess Pool of Scam’, is not Shaken.
[e] Justice N. Venkatachala who closed the case on 13th March, 2002, was allotted with three sites on his family members names. This Hush-up is haunting Karnataka High Court since 2002 till date in Writ Petitions P.I.L 40994/2002 & 7105/2007 & 13261/2006. The facts in Petitions is this that Up-Lokayukta was investigating whether Karnataka Employees HBCS which has secured more than few dozen Judgments from Karnataka High Court and Lower Courts till are bonafide or by Fraud. Few of prominent Judgments are ILR 1994 KAR 2115, ILR 1995 KAR 3139, etc. Up-Lokayukta G.P.Shivaparakash and Lokayukta came to know through Invesigations with B.D.A and other Departments that Judgments were “Given and Taken by Fraud, Collusion, with Corrupt motives etc.” and that no any allottee has any Legal Title of Ownership to their respective sites, in the Light of B.D.A’s reply to Up-lokayukta
[f] The facts which came to be determined by Lokayukta and High Court etc., are being raised again in High Court by Justice K.Jagannath Shetty, Up-Lokayukta G.P. Shivaprakash, Justice M.P. Chinnappa, Justice A.M. Farooq and Justice T.N. Vallinayagam, the Judges of Supreme Court, Karnataka High Court. Which facts are honestly reported in our websites. In WP 7105/2007 Up-Lokayukta G.P. Shivaprakash seek C.B.I Investigations in La-de-affairs of “Karnataka Employees HBCS” stating thus at:
Paragraph 30 [A]: “ It is Disgraceful that this Judicial Layout is mired in controversy and has become cesspool of Scandals. It has become Talk of The Town. An unknown source has created website www.judgesplot4plot.com derogatory to the position of Judges. It is submitted that there are too many skeletons in the closet and the management has no Sense of Duty or Shame and requires to be replaced. A thorough time bound inquiry by an independentant investigating agency of all the misdeeds including allotment of sites, convertion of civil amenity sites and beneficiaries of the society is essential.
Paragraph 30 [B]: Petitioners being retired Judges of Karnataka High Court are confronted by public with Questions for which they have no answers. The question normally asked if JUDICIAL Layout is Above Law
[g] The several judgments secured by “Karnataka Employees HBCS” state Land is acquired legally, compensation is paid to land lords legally by S.L.A.O, Judicial Layout is approved by Bangalore Development Authority. Civic Amenity sites of about 90 Acres is handed over to B.D.A, Sites are registered to bonafide Employees etc.,. And accordingly 2,400 plus sites are registered stating in each & every Sale Deed that Bangalore Development Authority has approved layout plan in 1992 .
[h] Up-Lokayukta came to know that Judgments were secured by Fraud and contrary to facts. Based on such Judgments 1,200 plus Judges from Superior Courts to Lower Courts, Judicial Officers were registered with sale deeds of sites stating layout is approved by B.D.A. Similarly 1,200 sites to Court peons, clerks, etc.,It also came to know that Layout is formed in Revenue Lands in 193 Acres, Land Grabbing of 37 Acres, no compensation is paid to land lords etc.,. Lokayukta failed to punish the Karnataka Employees HBCS and passed illegal Order of closure of Investigations, whereby it encouraged Corruption and made Contempt of Court, Land Grabbing, Fraud, Forgery, Cheating etc as legitimate; whereby Legislature Committee in 2007 estimates quantified 45,000 acres of Government Lands in Bangalore Urban is Grabbed and in many cases with Fraud Judgments etc., is one of contention and purpose of websites.
[i] It however may be noted that Karnataka High Court Justice G.P. Shivaprakash gave two judgments in favour of Karnataka Employees HBCS viz., W.P. 1600/1994 directing Government to hand-over 17 acres of land in 1994.
Then in W.P. 18447/1994 in 1994; striking down Karnataka Governemt direction to Sub-registrars “not to Register the Sites of Bangalore’s 32 House Building co-operative Societies including Karnataka Employees HBCS”. Judgment is reported as ILR 1994 KAR 2115. This Judgment based on Karnataka Employees HBCS registered 2,400 plus sites stating layout is approved by B.D.A including 320 Sites formed in un-acquired 33 Acres of lands, without ownership, convertion, B.D.A approval etc.,. Based on same Judgment several H.B.C.S also registered sites similarly.
5. Few Articles appeared in Kannada weekly “AGNI” continuously of the Applicants Investigations of large Scale corruption Indian Judiciary:
[a] in Part One April 28, 2005, Headlines read thus: “JUDICIAL Layout: JUDGES’ ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES”, “Whence Judges Themselves Kept JUSTICE on aUCTION”.
[b] Cover page of Part Two on May 5, 2005 Mr. Lokayukta: Why there is No RAID in JUDICIAL Layout?” and
[c] . Part Three on May 19, 2005 Issue “Judicial Layout: Clever is the One who has Food in the Marriage of Mental Lady” etc.
are Annexed as Ann- …. This continuous News for three weeks caught Men-in-Power by Awe, arose a kind of Surprise in the Karnataka Legislators, Police, and other Officials in Secretariat and across State. Many of them contacted and got records from Applicant. Most others purchased CDs from Gangaram Book Stores, M.G. Road, Bangalore.
5. The contents in Applicant’s websites and AGNI News, lead to “Karnataka Legislative Assembly Debates on 27th July,2005. The Debate is Annexed as Ann- . . . .
6. The Karnataka Assembly which has accepted the Interim Report Part-2 of “Karnataka Legislature Joint House Committee on ‘Encroachment of Government Lands in Bangalore City / Urban District’ Committee observed thus:
[A] at page 07 “Of the long list of erring HBCSs, the most notorious is the “Judicial Employees HBCS. Instead of being model for other HBCSs, this Society has Created an all-India record for being a Mother of Illegalities, unleashing tsunami of scandals”.
[B] At page 12 of Report under Heading “Criminal Prosecution of Land Grabbers, Government Officials and Non-Officials who actively promote, abet and assist Land Grabbing”: The Duty of the Administration is to uphold rule of law. The purpose of the Fence is to protect the Crops; to act as Guardian, Trustee and a Sentinel. But the few examples in the above paragraphs show that Fence itself is eating the Crops, the Guardian himself is molesting the ward, the Trustee is Robbing the Beneficiary and the sentinel is Looting the Citizens. If these Illegal, anti-social and unethical acts go unpunished, honest citizens will loose all faith in Government and the very Social Contract on which the State is founded will crumble as castles on foundation of sand.
[C] At pages 14-18 of the Report: STRANGE CASE OF KARNATAKA JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY – WHO WILL GUARD THE GUARDIANS ? …Gist is;
[i] It is therefore clear that the Judicial Employees HBCS.has violated the land Reforms Act and the land so held by the HBCS shall be forfeited to the Government along with structures on it. The HBCS gave an ingenious explanation to the Committee on 30 May 2007 that the lands through private negotiations were actually not purchased through Sale Deeds but only Agreements to Sale were effected and HBCS has taken possession of the lands on that basis. In some cases, and few land-holders have entered into a “Compromise” before the City Civil Judge. It is astounding as to how such “Compromise” in violation of the provisions of the Land Reforms Act and that too before a Court of Law can be entered.
[ii] The HBCS submitted a layout plan to the Bangalore Development Authority 6-11-1992 for approval. The BDA vide its letter dated 28-11-1992 resolved to approve the layout subject to certain conditions. However the HBCS never again went before the BDA.
[iii] The Judicial Employees HBCS then submitted its layout to the City Municipal Council, Yelahanka which is not a planning Authority for the lands of the HBCS as the BDA is the concerned authority under the Town and Country Planning Act. The CMC gave approval primarily for collection of fees at Rs. 9 per square foot. This was assumed to be “approval” of the layout for which CMC had no jurisdiction.
[iv] The Judicial Employees HBCS enrolled 3399 members and 1353 Associate Members and allotted 2268 sites. This included large numer of Associate Members including Judges of High Court / Supreme Court their family members, Politicians, Contractors, Officials like Police Inspectors who can not be even ‘honorary’ Judicial Officers.
[v] In October 2002 the Judicial Employees Welfare Association petitioned to the High Court about various violations committed by the HBCS and the HC by an Interim Order directed trhat no sites reserved for civic amenities and parks and public use should be distributed as sites by the HBCS. However the HBCS violated this direction also and distributed sites reserved for public use. Against this a contempt petition was filed by the Welfare Association which is being heard by the High Court of Karnataka ……..