Monthly Archives: August 2014

Justice Katju acquires new target: Blogs HL Dattu should not become CJI: 25.08. 2014

 

Press Council of India (PCI) chairman Markandey Katju has apparently set his crosshairs on the next Chief Justice of India (CJI), HL Dattu, in a column published by the Times of India and re-published on his own blog.

Katju argued in his post that the CJI post should not be awarded automatically on the basis of seniority amongst Supreme Court judges, but should be given to the most qualified and meritorious by the government – presumably under the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), which Katju was a staunch campaigner for.

Katju wrote:

The present Chief Justice of India, Justice Lodha, is retiring on 27th September , 2014, and the question now is who should be appointed his successor ?

In conclusion I repeat : when the present Chief Justice of India, Justice Lodha retires, the Government of India should not go by seniority but choose the fittest person and appoint him as the Chief Justice of India.

While Katju never mentioned Dattu by name in his column, Dattu is next in line by seniority to succeed Lodha after his retirement in a month on 27 September.

The thrust of Katju’s argument was that the government should be free to appoint high court and even lower court judges directly into the CJI position, citing examples of successful Supreme Court chief justices in the US such as ex-California governor Earl Warren or former district court judge John Roberts, who is currently presiding.

While Katju never specified why he was opposed to Dattu becoming chief, he outlined three options for why seniority should not be followed: questionable personal integrity; legal mediocrity; or that a high court’s chief justice could be better qualified (“At present I know of some outstanding Chief Justices of High Courts whom I regard as deserving to be appointed directly as Chief Justice of India”, added Katju, helpfully).

He also claimed to have “documentary proof” of the corruption of a former CJI, which had been known to the President and others before his appointment:

(1) The senior most judge may be a person of questionable integrity, or may have done wrong things. I have with me a dossier ( given to me by a senior member of the Committee of Judicial Accountability) of one senior judge of the Supreme Court containing documentary proof of his corruption, and yet he was appointed as Chief Justice of India being the senior most in the Supreme Court. A copy of this dossier had been sent to the President of India and other high authorities before his appointment as Chief Justice, but no heed was paid to it.

(2) The senior most judge may be a man of integrity, but may be a mediocre person. He, too, should be superseded, and a judge next in seniority, or one even lower down in seniority, if outstanding ( as borne out from his judgments),should be made Chief Justice of India.

As an aside, Katju also picks on ex-CJI Altamas Kabir (again without naming him by name). Kabir had been criticised widely in the media after his retirement over the elevation of his sister to the Kolkata high court:

A Chief Justice of India who retired recently got his sister elevated to his parent high court although she was almost 60 years old ( the retirement age of high court judges being 62) and was widely regarded as undeserving. The Chief Justice of the high court who recommended her name was rewarded by being elevated shortly thereafter to the Supreme Court, while the Judge next in seniority ( who has the highest standard of integrity) who strongly objected in writing to her appointment as she was undeserving,was punished by being denied elevation to the Supreme Court, while his junior was elevated. This is the price which has often to be paid for honesty !

 

http://www.legallyindia.com/201408254995/Bar-Bench-Litigation/katju-acquires-new-target-argues-hl-dattu-should-not-become-cji

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Pick-Chief-Justice-of-India-on-merit-and-not-seniority-Markandey-Katju-says/articleshow/40827047.cms

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cji-should-be-appointed-on-basis-of-merit-markandey-katju/493975-37-64.html

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Mr. CJI, ME TOO EUREKA No. – 2; INSPIRED BY CJI Mr. LODHA’s EUREKA: 13.08.2014

KarCJ-Eureka-2
13 August 2014

 

 

 

You have been dynamic, decisive and have taken a bold no nonsense stand against the land mafia who have grabbed 12 lakh acres worth lakhs of crores of rupees.

You are intolerant against corruption, illegality and land grabbing causing lakhs of crores of rupees loss to the State and public.

You want action – No Tareeq pe Tareeq for you.

You want the State Government to quickly reclaim encroached land as per the A.T. Ramaswamy Committee and Task Force Reports.

 

CONGRATULATIONS Mr. Chief Justice Waghela

 

BUT WILL YOU ACT THE SAME WAY AGAINST 867 SC & HC JUDGES WHO ARE PROVEN CRIMINAL LAND GRABBERS, LAND SHARKS, CORRUPT, CONTEMNERS AND PERJURERS WHO HAVE BEEN FOUND NOTORIOUSLY AND SHAMELESSLY GUILTY BY THE SAME A.T. Ramaswamy Committee and and Task Force Reports ?

 

BUT Mr. Waghela is it Eureka 2 or Eureka 3/4th. ?

EUREKA 2204 years after Archimedes !!

 

 

  1. Archimedes   127 B.C.    to    212 B.C.

 

The exclamation ‘Eureka!’ is famously attributed to the ancient Greek scholar Archimedes. He reportedly proclaimed “Eureka!” when he stepped into a bath and noticed that the water level rose—he suddenly understood that the volume of water displaced must be equal to the volume of the part of his body he had submerged. (This relation is notwhat is known as Archimedes’ principle—that deals with the upthrust experienced by a body immersed in a fluid.[2][3]) He then realized that the volume of irregular objects could be measured with precision, a previously intractable problem. He is said to have been so eager to share his discovery that he leapt out of his bathtub and ran through the streets of Syracuse naked.   (see wikipedia).

 

Would you be equally outraged, bold, decisive and intolerant of the 867 Judges who have behaved worse than petty land mafia, perjurers, contemners, land sharks and grabbers, Creating FRAUDULENT and FORGED Sale Deeds, cheating “FARMERS and GOVERNMENT, BY PLAYING ON HIGH COURT, and depriving genuine Judicial Employees who have paid their hard and honestly and legitimately and fully deserved earnings to be upstaged by judges?

 

Will you condemn all corrupt judges who have fraudulently grabbed sites and illegally constructed houses in an illegal layout and whom A.T. Ramaswamy in the Joint Legislature …….. Report condemns as “Of the long list of erring HBCS (Housing Building Co-Operative Societies) the MOST NOTORIOUS is the Judicial Employees HBCS.   Lofty principles such Rule of Law, Equality before Law, etc. are breached without any compunction by influential and powerful persons. People in authority vested with legal powers to enforce law have become mute spectators or, worse, reluctant or even willing participants. While the common man is always caught in the spider’s Web of Law and Rules, the rich and the bold are powerful enough to break the web of law.”?

 

The 14-15 predecessor Chief Justices of Karnataka failed in their duty and were abettors.

 

So also, the all knowing, all pervading, all sound and fury but no light Ram Mohan Reddy with his irrelevant ravings and ranting and only smiling and nodding        H. Billappa, emulated your 14-15 predecessors and resorted to passing illegal orders to suppress the truth or give Tareeq pe Tareeq and Tareeq pe Tareeq for TEN LONG YEARS and instead of hearing the matter, bhashans from arrogant, ill mannered and headline seeking Ram Mohan Reddy. All to favour the criminal judges – who happened to be BROTHERS, SISTERS, FATHERS , GRAND FATHERS, which in numbers was almost the entire strength of the High Court.

 

Will you Mr. Waghela emulate your 14-15 predecessors and help H.L. Dattu and T.S. Thakur and others and to do so?

 

Will you smother your conscience, shut your eyes, forget your oath, abandon your duty and abet the criminal judges by looking the other way and protect them so that criminal land grabbers or abettors enjoy the power and privelege and opportunity and continue to flourish and even reach the Supreme Court and like H.L. Dattu, T.S. Thakur and J.S. Kehar be CJI’s in waiting – not to mention the renowned Gopala Gowda who is enjoying his position as a SC judge?

 

Is Karnataka’s commanding position with dominating numbers in the SC because of merit, integrity, seniority or buddies in crime or abettors in crime?

 

Mr. Waghela – the same A.T. Ramaswamy Committee Report has classfied your brother judges and predecessor judges are the leading and most notorious law breakers and land grabbers. Do have courage to be bold, decisive and write to CJI Lodha about the several serious acts of land grabbing, perjury and contempt so that he can initiate suitable action against his brother SC judges?

 

Will you be bold and order prosecution of all guilty in the illegal land grabbing judicial layout and direct the State Government to reclaim the land within 60 days?

 

Or will you, like almost all judges have a separate rule, law, priveleges for judges who are masters and another for ordinary mortals who are lowly citizens?

 

Mr. Waghela, its 67 years since we were freed from the British. We look to you and other judges to free us from corruption, nepotism, cronism, chamchagiri, tyranny, oppression and dispense justice speedy and for all. Alas, the judiciary has miserably failed not only by ommission but acts of commission.          Mr. Waghela, you have taken a bold step but will you go the whole hog?

 

Tell us is it Eureka 2 or Eureka 3/4th. ? Is it new freshing dynamism, sense of duty, honesty or same old strategy to obfuscate, delay and fool the people of India?

 

  1. WAGHELA ACT NOW,  YOU ARE BEING WATCHED. YOU HAVE TO ANSWER THE PEOPLE AND YOURSELF.

ISSUED      IN   NATIONAL   INTEREST

 

 

Digvijay Mote

Justice Investigator . Editor.
JailCorrupt867Judges.wordpresss.com , IndianCorruptJudges.com
BANGALORE                                                                     13.08. 2014

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Judiciary at a crossroads: There are misgivings about judges’ appointment Bills even among opponents of collegium system August 22, 2014, Goolam E Vahanvati, Former Attorney General Of India

The movement to bring about a change in the way judges are appointed started energetically in 2009, when Veerappa Moily took over as law minister and i became the Attorney General. There was agreement all around that the system had to change. A lot of time and effort went into formulating the constitutional amendments in the resultant Bill to replace the collegium system. I personally discussed these issues with several eminent, retired chief justices. We tried to address as many concerns as possible. However, now the battle lines are drawn and positions have hardened.

On the one hand there are obviously the concerns of the judiciary – there is a strong feeling that the collegium system did not require wholesale displacement. Some tweaking and correction was necessary but the system could have been retained.

Nobody can deny the problems that exist. Some outstanding judges were left out of promotions for reasons which may not have been explained and were, in some cases, highly doubtful. Equally, some undeserving candidates sneaked in. There is also general acknowledgment of the lack of transparency.

The problem with the collegium system did not lie in mere exclusion of good people or inclusion of people for the wrong reasons. Talented people were delayed from coming into the Supreme Court, in several cases for reasons which appeared to be based on personal prejudices and predilections.

So several good judges made it to the Supreme Court much later than they deserved, as a result of which they did not even get a chance to preside over benches or effectively contribute to the court. Not only were their careers affected, in some cases they were even deprived of holding the post of Chief Justice of India. There are several sitting judges even today who have been victims of this shortcoming of the collegium system.

On the question of transparency, several chief justices have explained how the system worked and how much time and effort was invested by the collegium in going through the records of prospective candidates and analysing their work. However, these aspects cannot be expressed in public. After all, judges do not give media releases or hold press conferences. At the highest level, one has heard expressions of res-trained anguish and concern by the Chief Justice of India. Judges could not and cannot say more.

The situation has changed in the last couple of months. There have been dramatic disclosures and blog posts. The timing of such disclosures has been criticised in various quarters. Motives have been ascribed. However, what has been said has not been seriously controverted.

These disclosures have focussed sharply on the underlying problems, and were one of the factors which galvanised the government into action. More so when highly respected former judges have confirmed the correctness of what was stated in these dramatic disclosures. In such circumstances, the seriousness of the issues just could not be brushed aside.

Nevertheless, strong words were uttered the moment the constitutional amendments to set up a national judicial appointments commission were approved by Parliament, even by those who had earlier come out against the collegium system. Fali Nariman was first off the block. He expressed his point of view immediately after the Rajya Sabha approved the amendments. Kapil Sibal entered the fray shortly thereafter. Legal challenges have been threatened and are probably inevitable.

Through all this the government seems to have decided, perhaps wisely, not to enlarge the public debate. The challenge would be met as and when it presented itself in court.

Undoubtedly, that challenge is going to come. Battle lines will be sharpened. Issues will become more focussed. However, my concern is about what is going to emerge in the near future. There are so many alternatives before the court. One is, of course, to affirm the amendment Bill. The other would be to strike it down completely, on the ground that it violates the Constitution’s basic structure. I have serious doubts about the latter approach.

The ‘basic structure’ which would be spoken of in the second approach would simply refer to the independence of the judiciary. But mounting a challenge on this ground is not going to be easy. It is all very well to call the independence of the judiciary a part of the Constitution’s basic structure. But this basic structure cannot be determined with respect to concepts. Instead it involves the words and provisions of the Constitution as originally enacted.

Another approach could be to resort to some sort of mechanical surgery such as striking down some portions of the Bill. I am not very convinced such an approach will be practical or fully satisfactory.

So what lies ahead? Are we on a collision course? Is there a possibility of consensus? Can consensus be resorted to in constitutional challenges? Can one approach issues only in black and white?

This is my primary concern: I anticipate that positions on either side may harden. If so, concern for the system and judicial independence becomes greater.

I started by asking, is there a way forward? It is for all of us to decide whether we want a solution or whether we want a perpetuation of the problem. The future of the judiciary rests on whether there will be emanci-pated statesmanship on all sides.

The writer is a former Attorney General of India.

August 22, 2014, 12:02 AM IST  in TOI Edit Page | Edit Page

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Hon’ble Chief Justice Shri D.H. Waghela: ME TOO EUREKA No. – 2; INSPIRED BY CJI LODHA’s EUREKA

   CJI-R.M.LodhaKarCJ-Eureka-2

 eureka-Naked-Running

Mr. Waghela’s Bench wakes up after 25 years to recover land grab worth Rupees Lakhs of Crores; which the Karnataka HC and SCI slept over.

13 August 2014

You have been dynamic, decisive and have taken a bold no nonsense stand against the land mafia who have grabbed 12 lakh acres worth lakhs of crores of rupees.

You are intolerant against corruption, illegality and land grabbing causing lakhs of crores of rupees loss to the State and public.

You want action – No Tareeq pe Tareeq for you.

You want the State Government to quickly reclaim encroached land as per the A.T. Ramaswamy Committee and Task Force Reports.

CONGRATULATIONS Mr. Chief Justice Waghela

BUT WILL YOU ACT THE SAME WAY AGAINST 867 SC & HC JUDGES WHO ARE PROVEN CRIMINAL LAND GRABBERS, LAND SHARKS, CORRUPT, CONTEMNERS AND PERJURERS WHO HAVE BEEN FOUND NOTORIOUSLY AND SHAMELESSLY GUILTY BY THE SAME
A.T. Ramaswamy Committee and and Task Force Reports ?

BUT Mr. Waghela is it Eureka 2 or Eureka 3/4th. ?

EUREKA 2204 years after Archimedes !!

Eureka-1        eureka-Naked-Running

Archimedes   127 B.C.    to    212 B.C.

The exclamation ‘Eureka!’ is famously attributed to the ancient Greek scholar Archimedes. He reportedly proclaimed “Eureka!” when he stepped into a bath and noticed that the water level rose—he suddenly understood that the volume of water displaced must be equal to the volume of the part of his body he had submerged. (This relation is not what is known as Archimedes’ principle—that deals with the upthrust experienced by a body immersed in a fluid.[2][3]) He then realized that the volume of irregular objects could be measured with precision, a previously intractable problem. He is said to have been so eager to share his discovery that he leapt out of his bathtub and ran through the streets of Syracuse naked.   (see wikipedia).

Mr. Chief Justice Waghela, Would you be equally outraged, bold, decisive and intolerant of the 867 Judges who have behaved worse than petty land mafia, perjurers, contemners, land sharks and grabbers, Creating FRAUDULENT and FORGED Sale Deeds, cheating “FARMERS and GOVERNMENT, BY PLAYING FRAUDS and IN CRIMINAL CONTEMPT OF HIGH COURT OF 27 JUDGMENTS ON HIGH COURT, and depriving genuine Judicial Employees who have paid their hard and honestly and legitimately and fully deserved earnings to be upstaged by judges?

Will you condemn all corrupt judges who have fraudulently grabbed sites and illegally constructed houses in an illegal layout and whom A.T. Ramaswamy in the Joint Legislature …….. Report condemns as “Of the long list of erring HBCS (Housing Building Co-Operative Societies) the MOST NOTORIOUS is the Judicial Employees HBCS.   Lofty principles such Rule of Law, Equality before Law, etc. are breached without any compunction by influential and powerful persons. People in authority vested with legal powers to enforce law have become mute spectators or, worse, reluctant or even willing participants. While the common man is always caught in the spider’s Web of Law and Rules, the rich and the bold are powerful enough to break the web of law.”?

The 14-15 predecessor Chief Justices of Karnataka failed in their duty and were abettors.

So also, the all knowing, all pervading, all sound and fury but no light Ram Mohan Reddy with his irrelevant ravings and ranting and only smiling and nodding         H. Billappa, emulated your 14-15 predecessors and resorted to passing illegal orders to suppress the truth or give Tareeq pe Tareeq and Tareeq pe Tareeq for TEN LONG YEARS and instead of hearing the matter, bhashans from arrogant, ill mannered and headline seeking Ram Mohan Reddy. All to favour the criminal judges – who happened to be BROTHERS, SISTERS, FATHERS , GRAND FATHERS, which in numbers was almost the entire strength of the High Court.

Will you Mr. Waghela emulate your 14-15 predecessors and help H.L. Dattu and T.S. Thakur and others and to do so?

Will you smother your conscience, shut your eyes, forget your oath, abandon your duty and abet the criminal judges by looking the other way and protect them so that criminal land grabbers or abettors enjoy the power and privelege and opportunity and continue to flourish and even reach the Supreme Court and like H.L. Dattu, T.S. Thakur and J.S. Kehar be CJI’s in waiting – not to mention the renowned Gopala Gowda who is enjoying his position as a SC judge?

Is Karnataka’s commanding position with dominating numbers in the SC because of merit, integrity, seniority or buddies in crime or abettors in crime?

Mr. Waghela – the same A.T. Ramaswamy Committee Report has classfied your brother judges and predecessor judges are the leading and most notorious leading law breakers and land grabbers. Do have courage to be bold, decisive and write to CJI Lodha about the several serious acts of land grabbing, perjury and contempt so that he can initiate suitable action against his brother SC judges?

Will you be bold and order prosecution of all guilty in the illegal land grabbing from FARMERS for Judicial Layouts and direct the State Government to reclaim the land within 60 days and to RETURN LANDS WITH STRUCTURES THEREON TO POOR FARMERS?

Or will you, like almost all judges have a separate rule, law, priveleges for judges who are masters and another for ordinary mortals who are lowly citizens?

Mr. Waghela, it is 67 years since we were freed from the British. We look to you and other judges to free us from corruption, nepotism, cronism, chamchagiri, tyranny, oppression and dispense justice speedy for all.

Alas, the judiciary has miserably failed not only by ommission but acts of commission.   Mr. Waghela, you have taken a bold step but will you go the whole hog?

Tell us is it Eureka 2 or Eureka 3/4th. ? Is it new freshing dynamism, sense of duty, honesty or same old strategy to obfuscate, delay and fool the people of India?

WAGHELA ACT NOW,   YOU ARE BEING WATCHED.

                             YOU HAVE TO ANSWER THE PEOPLE AND YOURSELF.

 

ISSUED      IN   NATIONAL   INTEREST

Digvijay Mote

Justice Investigator . Editor.
JailCorrupt867Judges.wordpresss.com , IndianCorruptJudges.com
BANGALORE
13.08. 2014

V-CARD-FRONT

MOTE-V.CARD-BACKjpg

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

“Society is not perfect. We came from the same society. We too are not perfect” :CJI LODHA & 2 BROTHER JUDGES ! EUREKA 2204 years after Archimedes !!

CJI-Eureka-5pgs-14.08.14 

Society is not perfect. We came from the same society. We too are not perfect” :CJI LODHA & 2 BROTHER JUDGES ! EUREKA 2204 years after Archimedes !!

 

 Eureka-1eureka-Naked-Running

  1. Archimedes   127 B.C.    to    212 B.C.

The exclamation ‘Eureka!’ is famously attributed to the ancient Greek scholar Archimedes. He reportedly proclaimed “Eureka!” when he stepped into a bath and noticed that the water level rose—he suddenly understood that the volume of water displaced must be equal to the volume of the part of his body he had submerged. (This relation is notwhat is known as Archimedes’ principle—that deals with the upthrust experienced by a body immersed in a fluid.[2][3]) He then realized that the volume of irregular objects could be measured with precision, a previously intractable problem. He is said to have been so eager to share his discovery that he leapt out of his bathtub and ran through the streets of Syracuse naked.   (see wikipedia).

CONGRATULATIONS! CJI & 2 BROTHER JUDGES ON YOUR 21st CENTURY REALISATION   . .
THAT JUDGES LIKE SOCIETY ARE IMPERFECT

What did the Supreme Court mean when it said :-

“Society is not perfect. We came from the same society.

We too are not perfect.”

  1. There are sex perverts in society. So also in the judiciary.

eg : Mysore ROOST Sex Scandal 2002 – 2003 – High Court Judges/Roosters came to Roost.

          Rajasthan High Court Sex Scandal.

Swatanter Kumar – now National Green Tribunal

Latest Known : Madhya Pradesh High Court Sex Scandal.

  1. Many in society hush up, look the other way. So also in the judiciary.

eg :   Hushing up Sex Scams – See examples in Para 1 above.

Hushing up Supreme Court & High Court Judges Land Scam – land grabbing, illegal construction, false affidavits etc. , valued at Rs. 8,454 Crores.

  1. Society’s criminals claim dignity protection of reputation.   So also in the judiciary.

eg :   See CJI Lodha’s anguish & his two silent brother judges!

          Justice Swatanter Kumar.

  1. Society is like a septic tank – the bigger lumps rise to the top.   So also judiciary.

eg : CJI in waiting H.L. Dattu

          superceded CJI in waiting T.S. Thakur

          Justice Gopala Gowda

CJ Karnataka HC – D.H. Waghela & almost all brother judges of the Karnataka HC like K.L. Manjunath, Ram Mohan Reddy, H. Billappa, H.N. Satyanarayana & His Godfather R.V. Raveendran Retired SC Judge but active wheeler dealer.

  1. Society throws up respectable chai wallahs to the top. But the judiciary throws up petty small retail wine shop owner as CJI in waiting – Justice H.L. Dattu.
  2. Many in society sacrifice self respect, dignity and principles for selfish reasons like power, position, money etc.

eg : superceded CJI in waiting T.S. Thakur, who was a judge

when CJI in waiting H.L. Dattu was a Counsel for the corrupt, land grabbing 867 Judges of the SC & HC is now happy to be junior to H.L. Dattu. Resign? and lose my chance to Lord it over? Forget it.

  1. Society’s deviant persons reward those who help them escape. So also the judiciary.

eg : CJI in waiting H.L. Dattu who acted as Counsel for 867 corrupt, land grabbing judges.

H.L. Dattu’s Reward :-  

  • possibly first incompetent petty small retail wine shop owner and part time Counsel to be appointed a High Court Judge.
  • possibly the first CJI in waiting to have suffered a money decree of about Rs. 50,000/-, who prayed for and paid this decretal sum in installments due to financial inability. Now a few years later, his asstes are worth investigating and the results will shock.
  • S. Thakur having being protected in the 867 corrupt, land grabbing judges case (of which T.S. Thakur was one of the judges) reported in ILR 1995 Kar 3139, T.S. Thakur remained mum when H.L. Dattu superceded him. Fear, blackmail or gratitude?
  • doubly rewarded with 2 sites (Site Nos. 2095 and 859/D) in the land grabbed, illegal, contemptuous judicial layout and joined company with hundreds of other corrupt judges at the cost of genuine employees.
  1. There are contemners and perjurers in society. So also in judiciary.

eg : H.L. Dattu, T.S. Thakur, Gopala Gowda – sitting SC judges and retired SC judges like Rajendra Babu, R.V. Raveendran, S. Mohan etc., 25 sitting judges of the Karnataka High Court, CJ of Calcutta HC etc.

  1. SC Judge and Karnataka Lok Ayukta Santosh Hegde also claimed to be a judicial employee and hence member of the infamous, fraudulent, land grabbing Karnataka State Judicial Department Employees Housing Building Co-operative Society.

Society has patriots who work for national integration. So also the judiciary.

eg : T.S. Thakur – as judge J&K High Court was an allottee of a site No. 1273 in the land grabbing, illegal judicial layout of the Karnataka State Judicial Department Employees Housing Building Co-operative Society.

WHAT BETTER NATIONAL INTEGRATION?

OR WAS IT FORESIGHT AND VISION BY T.S. THAKUR THAT HE WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO KARNATAKA HC ?

  1. Society remembers GOD when helpless. So also the judiciary.

eg : CJI Lodha’s   – invocation in Court on 11.08.2014.

Eureka! My Lord’s are human, men with feet of clay, imperfect, with limitations like society.

FOR GOD’s SAKE, WOULD THE JUDICIARY NOW GIVE UP ITS ARROGANCE, FALSE PRIDE AND EGO, RUDENESS, CLAIMING THAT THEY ARE THE PARAGONS OF VIRTUE AND THE ONLY CREDIBLE INSTITUTION IN INDIA?  

MOST IMPORTANTLY, WILL THEY GIVE UP THE UNDUE PRIVILEGES AND TREAT THEMSELVES ON PAR WITH OTHERS IN SOCIETY?

WILL THEY TREAT THEMSELVES AS SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE OF INDIA?

WILL THEY ACCEPT ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY?

WILL THEY ALLOW VIDEOGRAPHY OF COURT PROCEEDINGS?

WILL THEY SUBJECT THEMSELVES TO RTI?

WILL THEY SEND BLACK SHEEP TO JAIL LIKE OTHER CRIMINALS IN SOCIETY?

ISSUED      IN   NATIONAL   INTEREST

Digvijay Mote

Justice Investigator . Editor.
JailCorrupt867Judges.wordpresss.com , IndianCorruptJudges.com
BANGALORE                                                           11.08. 2014

FINAL LODHA 13.08.2014 -Wt-VCards

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Indian media: Judicial reforms: 14 August 2014 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india

Indian media: Judicial reforms 

The government says reforms will make judiciary more efficientThe government says reforms will make judiciary more efficient

Media in India are discussing the government’s plan to reform the country’s judicial system by changing the way the judges are appointed.

The lower house of India’s parliament on Wednesday passed a bill to replace decades-old system of appointing judges.

The old method, known as the collegium system, allowed a forum of the chief justice and other top judges to appoint and transfer their colleagues.

The new bill replaces the collegium system with an independent commission.

The bill will become law after it’s passed in the upper house of the parliament and is approved by the president.

Some experts have expressed concern that the law may undermine the independence of the judiciary.

But Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad says the proposed law does not impact the judiciary’s independence.

“We are for maintaining the sanctity of the judiciary… We have said that this house respects the independence of the judiciary. That should be assuring,” The New Indian Express quotes him as saying.

The report say the passage of the bill “marked the nascent Narendra Modi government’s opening innings in passing big legislations”.

The “landmark bill” comes amid the “government’s assertion that the measure was aimed at ensuring that only meritorious people are selected as judges to the higher courts”, The Times of India reports.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-28783457

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

MP judge sexual harassment case: Law Minister seeks fair inquiry : 06 August 2014

New Delhi: Allegations of sexual harassment levelled by an additional district judge in Madhya Pradesh against a High Court judge should be inquired into fairly and appropriate action should be taken, Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said Tuesday.

3JudgesSkeltetons
“An incident of alleged sexual harassment of an additional district judge in Madhya Pradesh by a High Court judge has come in media. This incident, as reported, is deeply regrettable and unfortunate,” Prasad told reporters outside Parliament House.

The Law Minister said the matter is sensitive and it is very assuring that the Chief Justice of India himself has taken initiative to follow up the issue in the light of the complaint.

4th Monkey

 

“I would wish, more as a citizen of India, that the matter needs to be inquired into fairly and objectively and in the event if the allegations are found to be correct, then I am sure, the judiciary led by the hon’ble CJI would be wise enough to take appropriate action,” Prasad said.

A woman additional district and sessions judge in Gwalior has quit her job after accusing a judge of the Gwalior bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court of sexual harassment, a charge he has rejected and offered to face death penalty if found true.

JUDICIARY’s INTERPRETATION OF “SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL , DO NO EVIL, DO NO EVIL”

JUDICIARY’s INTERPRETATION OF “SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL , DO NO EVIL, DO NO EVIL”

The woman judge concerned has sent a nine-page representation to the CJI stating that the high court judge had some months ago started showing “more than normal interest” in her work and had gradually started making “coloured remarks” about her.

PTI

 

First Published: Tuesday, August 05, 2014, 16:03

…………….

Last Updated: Tuesday, August 05, 2014, 16:03

http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/mp-judge-sexual-harassment-case-law-minister-seeks-fair-inquiry_952612.html

https://jailcorrupt867judges.wordpress.com/2014/07/19/judiciarys-interpretation-of-see-no-evil-hear-no-evil-speak-no-evil-do-no-evil/

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized