[ Copy on Letter head: 19.07.14.Color.-10pgs-CJI-Ltr.-SCI Colegium-3- WISE MONKEYS ]
JUSTICE INVESTIGATOR . EDITOR.
18th July 2014
Mr. Justice R.M. Lodha,
The Chief Justice of India,
Supreme Court of India,
New Delhi. 110 011
“SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL” : THREE WISE MONKEYS
INDIAN JUDICIARY’s INTERPRETATION OF “SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL , DO NO EVIL ”
“SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL , DO NO EVIL” : INDIAN JUDICIARY’s INTERPRETATION
- “MYSORE SEX SCANDAL”
- Media is powerful, media has proof, media is unrelenting.
- Supreme Court’s in house committee’s findings will be exposed as a hoax.
- Supreme Court gives Quietus. Quietly buries the scandal and with it justice. Contempt Case still remains buried.
- Moral of the story – contempt a tool against weak and hapless citizens and whistle blowers.
- Advantage Judges. Judges alleged to be involved retire, some die and the lucky ones get elevated to the Supreme Court.
- Gopala Gowda brought to Delhi via Orissa HC. Ceasar’s wife must be above suspicion a medievial concept only for the Romans. Anyway, it doesn’t apply to Ceasar himself.
- Karnataka High Court Full Bench hearing the Mysore Sex Scandal Contempt Petition – Thakur, Dattu & Sabahit JJ.
Thakur & Dattu CJIs in waiting.
Inter-se seniority interchanged.
Principled ‘forward looking judges’
like K.S. Hegde & Hans Raj Khanna
now replaced by ‘judges looking forward’
like Dattu & Thakur JJ.
Spoils of office of CJI too alluring to Dattu & Thakur JJ. for principles like seniority.
- LAND SHARKS & MAFIA, ILLEGAL DEVELOPERS, PUT TO SHAME BY JUDGES.
See : JailCorrupt867Judges.wordpress.com ,
Judicial layouts in Bangalore with active connivance of 867 judges of the High Court and Supreme Court who have grabbed sites and put up illegal layouts.
A.T. RAMASWAMY KARNATAKA STATE JOINT LEGISLATURE COMMITTEE ON LAND GRABBING IN BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT HELD :
A. The Judicial Employees House Building Co-Operative Society, Karnataka High Court, Bangalore 1 is the most notorious and tops the list of cheating and frauds.
B. Sitting Judges applied for membership of the Judicial Employees Society, by-passed the genuine employees who had put in their hard earned money and were waiting for years for an imaginary site, and got themselves allotted sites out of turn. They also facilitated the land grabbing and put up an illegal layout without any ownership in the land or any sanctions or approvals. Enough to put land sharks and land mafia to shame.
C. BDA said on Affidavit in W.P. No. 40994/2002 that layout not approved and illegal and without ownership of land, sites have been alloted to judges including H.L. Dattu, T.S. Thakur, Gopalagowda, K.L. Manjunath, R.V. Raveendran, and Rajendra Babu, interalia 867 Employees-Cum-Judges.
- The Employees Housing Society itself in its Affidavit in W.P. No. 40994/2002 has stated that the layout is not approved by BDA and the Sale Deeds in respect of Learned, respected and honest judges reads that it is a BDA approved layout.
E. Then having committed these illegal acts, the Judges sat in judgement of their own misdeeds, illegalities and immoralities. Not one judge has come forward till date to apologise to the people of India and return their sites, nor own moral responsibility and resign as Judges.
3. Mr. Chief Justice Lodha, you promised the people of India that you would fearlessly protect the independence of the judiciary.
- Mr. Chief Justice Lodha, you took a very high sounding principled stand and moral high ground on the Gopal Subramaniam elevation matter and solemnly promised the people of India that you would fearlessly protect the independence of the Judiciary.
- What independence can the Judiciary have when the Judges themselves have committed serious illegalities and acted as land sharks and land mafia.
- More importantly, brother Judges hear the matter and Mr. Ram Mohan Reddy stalls and frustrates the litigation for years even though otherwise he is very brash, rude, offensive and arrogant in all other matters.
- In W.P. No. 12278/2007 Ram Mohan Reddy J. issued a judicial direction to the Bangalore Corporation not to issue any Katha to any illegal and unapproved and unsanctioned layout to ensure that Bangalore does not become a slum and its citizens do not suffer.
- Yet, the same Ram Mohan Reddy J. with impeccable honesty (considering he doesn’t own a site in the illegal layout) in W.P. No. 40994/2002 directed the Bangalore Corporation TO TAKE OVER THE ILLEGAL JUDICIAL LAYOUT FORMED IN CRIMINAL CONTEMPT OF 27 HIGH COURT JUDGEMENTS.
- In this manner, Ram Mohan Reddy has dutifully followed the Supreme Court’s putting a quietus in the Mysore Sex Scandal.
- Ram Mohan Reddy’s young brother-in-law and son of the Advocate Association’s President Subba Reddy gets rewarded by being designated as a Senior Counsel.
- Mr. Chief Justice, the first step to an independent Judiciary is Judges who do not have skeletons in their cupboards. This is a case where there is nothing in the cupboard and everything in flesh and blood is out in the open.
- For your information, M. Ramakrishna J., the then Chief Justice who is also an employee member of the Society has written a letter to the Upa Lokayukta (G.P. Shivaprakash J. Retd. who himself is a member of the notorious Judicial Employees Society), recording that the then Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court S. Mohan had managed to persuade the Chief Minister to hand over possession of the land and requested the Upa Lok Ayukta to vacate the stay Order in Upa Lok Ayukta Case No. BCD.64/99-2000 ARE-2, restraining the Sub-Registrar from registering the sites.
- What independence are you talking about Mr. Chief Justice? When it suits Judges, they claim to be independent and pillars of the Constitution of India. For few Rupees they can sacrifice their independence, swallow their false pride, forget their high Office and Constitutional position, duty to justice etc.
4. Mr. Chief Justice Lodha, independence of the Judiciary is only an illusive concept. You are chasing a mirage.
- cowardly institution can never be independent.
- A hypocritical institution with double standards can never be independent.
- A weak institution that punishes the whistleblower and shoots the messenger of bad news and cannot brook criticism can never be independent. Broad shoulders of the judiciary are a convenient tool in contempt jurisdiction in favour of rich, famous and powerful. Majesty of law a tool in contempt jurisdiction of poor, hapless citizens and whistleblowers.
- A corrupt and dishonest institution can never be independent.
- A bully institution can never be independent.
- An institution which offers sops to members of the Bar in the form of face value, privileges, judgements, elevation to the Bench and designation as Seniors, and discourages, derides, insults unknown faces and juniors can never be independent.
- An institution that shuns transparency and accountability can never be independent. An institution that is afraid of its proceedings being videographed and made available freely, is an institution that is weak, lacks moral courage and has much to hide.
- An institution whose members seek post retirement benefits loose their independence to an official car, bungalow and other spoils of office.
- An institution whose members start criticizing the judiciary after retirement does not behove either the judiciary or the critics themselves.
- By remaining mute and silent spectators and not invoking contempt against A.T. Ramaswamy and the Joint Legislature Committee and the M.L.As and M.L.Cs of Karnataka Legislative Assembly and Council, or in any way prosecuting them, or taking any steps to dispel the very serious allegations of illegality on the part of the Judiciary, AND ignoring Justice Bhattacharya’s comment on rape of the Calcutta HC, the judiciary has overwhelmingly proved that it has men with feet of clay and is nothing but a conglomeration of bullies. To the rich and powerful the judiciary is submissive by pretending to hear no evil, see no evil and speak no evil when what is seen, heard and spoken is the evils in the Judiciary.
- The above equally holds true in the Mysore Sex Scandal and the Provident Fund Scam etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.
- However, in my case the cowardly judiciary is hiding behind a Registrar and a PRO of the Lok Ayukta office who instituted a false and bogus complaint in 2004 because as whistleblower my family and I were distributing pamphlets and CDs exposing the evils in the judiciary and the land grab. Dr. K. Bhaktavatsala & C.R. Kumarswamy JJ heard my matter even though they were disabled being beneficiaries and parties to the land grab. Even my request to them to recuse themselves was turned down. Is that the Indian Judiciary’s concept of independence?
- Chief Justice D.H. Waghela does not hesitate threatening and reprimanding litigants who have filed genuine PILs. He even goes to the extent of threatening to get an Advocate who was arguing a PIL arrested. For Waghela J., PIL is not existent in Indian Jurisprudence. His manner of conducting Court is no different from the many other offensive,
impatient and rude Judges in the Karnataka High Court. But what may interest you is that if you study the PILs that Waghela J. has heard and his manner of dealing with them or keeping them pending without Orders would reveal a lot. At times, he roars at times he purrs – typical of the malaise in the Indian Judiciary which has thrown up Judges like S.N. Satyanarayana and equally foul mouthed Ram Mohan Reddy.
- S.N. Satyanarayana chela of R.V. Raveendran – previously his beneficiary and now his benefactor who apprises R.V. Raveendran of the days cases every morning in Lalbaugh and receives instructions from R.V. Raveendran as to how to dispose of the days matters to benefit R.V. Raveendran’s business associates and benamindars.
- Mr. Chief Justice, you still have 35 days to go to redeem your promise and go down in the annals of Indian history as a Judge who put his pen where his mouth is and did not merely make sensational statements for effect. If you do not immediately step in and stop the rot, your promise to the people of India will be no different from your suggestion of 365 days of Court working. Mr. Chief Justice, first let the Courts work even in the 200 odd days that it is supposed to work. Investigate corrupt Judges and the sons, daughters, spouses, collection and connecting agents of sitting and retired High Court Judges and even benamidars of practicing Advocates, in short the social and money nexus between the Bench and the Bar. Begin with investigating corrupt henchmen, dishonest, chamcha lawyers and brokers.
11. I am fighting for a clean judiciary and Indian democracy since 27 years. I am PUC pass. The said Judges Housing Scam running into more than Rs. 8000 Crores; I am hurt and mentally molested by the way 867 judges are day in and out gang raping the blindfolded justice God. The rape of the mother High Court cannot be tolerated by any right thinking person.
- Mr. Chief Justice please keep in mind the Honour and faith the people have reposed in you and see that the judiciary sees no evil, hears no evil, speaks no evil and does no evil.
SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL , DO NO EVIL : INDIAN JUDICIARY’s INTERPRETATION
ISSUED IN PUBLIC INTEREST
—- Signed —- 18th July 2014
Justice Investigator . Editor.
Copies To :
- The President of India.
- The Prime Minister of India.
- The Law Minister of India.
- The Finance Minister of India.
- The Chief Justice of India & his brother/sister Judges.
- D.H. Waghela, The Chief Justice of Karnataka & his brother/sister Judges.
- The Chief Justices of all High Courts & there brother/sister Judges.
8. The Chief Ministers of all States.
9. The Law Ministers of all States.
10.Members of Lok Sabha.
11.Members of Rajya Sabha.
12.The Bar Council of India.