Monthly Archives: April 2016

Karnataka Lokayukta Institutional Corruption / Impeachment of Bhaskar Rao – Karnataka Govt. & Legislature WAKE-Up call since 2003 by our http://indiancorruptjudges.com/ Investigations

jailcorrupt867judges

“Indian DEMOCRACY is in DANGER; when 867 Judges, who have NEVER Learned to OBEY the LAW Are given THE RIGHT to COMMAND”
To Make India Corruption Free: To Activate JUDICIARY =
 Jail Corrupt 867 Judges by Judges, For Judges = http://indiancorruptjudges.com/

Justice-Pan-Notes

The scam

  • Karnataka Lokayukta Y Bhaskar Rao’s son Ashwin and his associates ran an extortion racket
  • They would threaten officials with ‘raids’ and demand money to stop them
  • It is estimated that they made around Rs 200 crore before the lid was blown off the scam
  • They used Rao’s office and residence to run this scam
  • Ashwin and Syed Riyaz, the masterminds, are now in custody
How the Bhaskar Rao case has dismantled the Karnataka Lokayukta
Opposition Seeks Impeachment Motion Against Lokayukta

Congress joins ‘oust-Justice Rao’ party

NEWS9: Chorus grows but Lokayukta is adament – YouTube
How Lokayukta Bhaskar Rao is holding Karnataka to ransom
Karnataka Lokayukta’s impeachment: 83 MLAs sign…

View original post 459 more words

Advertisements

Leave a comment

April 29, 2016 · 9:58

JUDICIAL LAYOUT- Order in WP 7105/2007-Making karnataka into SLUM- 14 Years WP.PIL.40994/2002, CCC.87/2004, 7105/2007, The RAPE of HIGH COURT – by 867 Employee-Cum-Lokayuktas & Judges

jailcorrupt867judges

Honble Justice RAM MOHAN REDDY & H.BILLAPPA
22/01/2016
Order in WP 7105/2007
After marathon arguments lasting for over five hours, we find from the records there is lack of material particulars over serious allegations touching upon the conduct of the business by the Society, said to be the beneficiary more than 154 acres of land acquired for a public purpose, by the State. The bye-laws have been read and re-read by all the learned counsel pointing to conditions relating to admission of persons as members and their rights to benefits. Earlier pronouncements of the Division Bench have also been referred to. Specific reference is made to Annexure-R10 to the statement of objections of the respondent-Society, being an order dated 29.9.2008 under Section 68 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (for short Act ).

In the State of Karnataka, the respondent-House Building Co-operative Society is not only one which is…

View original post 350 more words

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized