- Karnataka Judicial Employees Housing Society Limited, Karnataka High Court. Bangalore
Bout No. I: 1995. Scene: Karnataka High Court & Supreme Court
Bout No.II: 1999-2002; Scene:Karnataka Lokayukta .
[A] Upa Lokayukta Suo moto Complaint No. COMPT/UPLOK/BCD/64/1999
Upa Lok Ayukta Judicial Order Sheet 90 Pages [ Read More ]
[B]Upa Lokayukta Complaint No. COMPT/UPLOK/BCD/125/2000 dated 7/8/2000 against N.Shivanna “VIOLATION OF RULES IN ALLOT MENT OF SITES IN KSJDEHBCS BANGALORE”.
[C] Legalized not only 156 Acres of lands illegally developed & forming / 2,100 sites; but also legalized 320 sites formed in un-acquired lands of 37 acres of lands.
11 VIP site Allottees Details:Un-Acquired Lands.320Sites
[D]WRIT PETITION No. 15101 of 2001 [GM]
- Bout No.III: 2002-2012 Yet On; Scene: Karnataka High Court .
In India; Karnataka Sate: In 1995; 23 Sitting Karnataka High court judges RECUSED from Hearing Petitions; who were Members of Karnataka Judicial Department Employees House Building Co-Operative Society Limited, Karnataka High Court, Bangalore. Who are they? [ Read More]. Last two remaining High Court Judges heard the Cases.Karnataka High Court dismissed the Petitions Fraudulently with Corrupt motives to save Corrupt-867-Brother-Judges of India on 12 October, 1995. Judgment Reported as ILR 1995 KAR 3139 or for proper appreciation of Frauds played by High Court read here where Facts & Figures are provided [ Read More ] [Read More].
- Supreme Court of India: Law Day speech by Hon’ble Shri S.H. Kapadia, Chief Justice of India at the Supreme Court Lawns on 26th November, 2011
News: If anyone knows a Judge is beleived to be corrupt; Take a Stand & Name him in Public & Tell the Chief Justice– Hon’ble Shri S.H. Kapadia, Chief Justice of India. 26 Nov 2011
- …………Data for Use………………..
Judicial Layout Writ Petitions Pending In Karnataka High court:viz.,
1]WP [PIL] 40994/2002 : Index To Memorandum of Writ Petition [ Read More ] .
2] WP [PIL] No. 7105 of 2007: Index to Petition [ Read More ]Crux: Justice G.P. Shivaprakash petitions along with Two more Judge-Employee-Beneficiary Petitioners; claim “Judicial Layout is Above Law. There are many Skeletons in Closet. Seek CBI Investigations. Scanned Writ Petition Synopsis, List of Dates, WP, Anexures 078.02 .
3]WP.13261/2006 : Two Kar HC Judges-Employee-Claim-Society-Cheated-Them.
Scanned in Three Parts. Part-1: Index, Synopsis Pages 6.
Part-II Writ Petition. 23 Pages . Part-III Annexures ‘A’ to ‘H’. Pages 118 .Past in 2007 Supreme Court: 4] S.L.P No. 5057/2007:By Judicial Dept Emp HBCS against High Court Contempt Proceedings in C.C.C. 87/2004. Disposed-Off by Supreme Court; directing Society to raise the Questions before High Court. Scanned in Three Parts: Part-I Orders, List Of Annexures, Synopsis 33 pages[ Read More ]. Part-II: Special Leave Petition. 17 Pages[Read More] .Part-III: “Annexures ‘P1’ to ‘P-16”. 72 Pages [ Read More ] Few Judgments; which may not be in websites:
 Supreme Court Finding: in Society’s SLP No.12153 of 2000 [026.22] & List of Dates [ List of Dates [026.22A] . is SC.Judgment..Society Need Not Pay Convertion Fine. Revenue Site Owners have to Pay . Means, that Site Owners have to Cough-up conversion Charge as any other Revenue Site owners, including 867 Judges. Then, if so, how can B.D.A approve Revenue Layout; as until other-side of Bellary Road, BDA has acquired Lands including Revenue Sites for Arkavati Layout, BDA Stopped Short or Scared Judiciary?
 SC.Judgment.27 Apl, 2004.Society Need Not Pay Convertion Fine. Revenue Site Owners have to Pay
 12, Apl,2006; Kar HC: Society Need Not Pay Convertion Fine, Est Cost & Litigation Cost. J.B. Padmraj & J. Abdul Nazeer.24pgs.